Hollywood for Sale (Again): Political Favor, Regulatory Blindness, and the High-Cost Collapse of Legacy Media

Warner Bros. Discovery is barreling toward its fourth ownership change in seven years, a span marked by extraordinary value destruction, unchecked executive churn, and an industry unwilling—or unable—to confront the structural failures hollowing out the U.S. media sector. Instead of stabilizing long-term businesses, these megadeals have become vehicles for a handful of executives, financiers, and political allies to trade century-old cultural institutions like poker chips.

Now, as Paramount Skydance, Comcast, and Netflix submit revised bids, Warner Bros. has become both a case study in desperate legacy media and a referendum on how easily U.S. regulators will greenlight another wave of consolidation that enriches executives while leaving employees, investors, and the public behind.

---

Paramount-Skydance: The Ellison Dynasty Advances on Hollywood

The driving force behind the newest acquisition push is David Ellison—a 42-year-old producer armed with a nearly limitless financial backstop from his father, Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison. After securing Paramount for $8 billion with substantial family assistance, Ellison immediately turned his attention to Warner Bros., submitting three unsolicited bids as high as $23.50 per share, all of which were rejected.

With fresh capital, Wall Street enthusiasm, and a White House willing to host him at state dinners alongside the Saudi Crown Prince, Ellison is pursuing a scale-driven strategy that raises fundamental questions about media consolidation and political influence. In an industry where traditional debt markets have dried up, private dynasties and sovereign wealth funds are stepping in, often with geopolitical implications that regulators rarely confront.

If successful, Paramount-Skydance could combine the Warner Bros. TV and film library, the HBO Max subscriber base, a merged slate of cable networks, and a combined output targeting 30 films per year.

This proposal is not simply vertical integration—it is Ellison attempting to monopolize filmed entertainment with inherited capital, political access, and foreign sovereign partnerships.

---

Netflix: The Surprising—and Troubling—Bidder

Netflix’s quiet but serious entrance into the bidding process is perhaps the most consequential twist. With a $466 billion market cap, minimal debt compared to peers, and an insatiable need for evergreen IP, Netflix wants the crown jewels: Warner Bros. Studios, HBO, HBO Max, and the entire library—Batman, Harry Potter, Looney Tunes, The Sopranos, and more.

In practical terms, Netflix would be buying the last remaining library capable of challenging its global dominance. This deal would cement Netflix as the first true worldwide media monopoly.

Regulators should balk, but history suggests otherwise. The same federal apparatus that rubber-stamped the disastrous AT&T–Time Warner merger and Disney’s acquisition of Fox seems prepared to overlook extraordinary concentration. Even lawmakers raising concerns privately concede that regulatory pushback is unlikely to be meaningful.

Netflix has built its empire through organic growth, but acquiring Warner Bros. would fundamentally alter global media power.

---

See What Streamers Pay in Major Markets

Develop, Budget, Negotiate, and Forecast with Precision.

---

Comcast: A Legacy Giant Running Out of Time

Comcast’s position is more precarious by the day. With $99 billion in debt and steep declines across its linear TV holdings, Comcast is the last legacy conglomerate still pretending it can compete with the tech platforms. Its Peacock service remains the smallest premium streamer.

According to individuals with direct knowledge, Comcast intends to enter the second round of bidding this week. It is weighing an aggressive offer that could value Warner Bros. Discovery’s studio and streaming operations at $27–$28 per share. Such a bid would catapult Comcast ahead of both Paramount-Skydance and Netflix.

For Comcast, acquiring Warner Bros. is not a growth strategy—it is a survival strategy. Failing to secure Warner Bros. could expose Comcast itself to future takeover attempts. Regulators failed to stop Disney from swallowing Fox, and they seem poised to look similarly the other way as Comcast attempts to consolidate two of Hollywood’s final major studios under one roof.

This fight is not about synergies or innovation—it is a scramble among declining giants to survive the industry’s next contraction.

---

A Recycling Bin of Failed Megamergers

The most absurd part of the Warner Bros. saga is how frequently these same assets have changed hands—with catastrophic results:

• 2018: AT&T acquires Time Warner.
• 2022: AT&T dumps WarnerMedia into Discovery.
• 2024–25: Warner Bros. is back on the block after thousands of layoffs, write-downs, and failed restructurings.

Each time, executives and bankers walked away with millions, while employees were gutted, creative teams fled, and debt levels soared. 

Investors were left holding the bag as the company’s stock collapsed—only to rebound now that another set of buyers believes it can pull off the same trick.

This cycle is not capitalism creating efficiency; it is regulatory negligence enabling a recurring cycle of consolidation, mismanagement, and extraction.

---

Political Influence and Backroom Incentives

One of the least discussed but most significant factors in the current bidding war is the intersection of politics and media unification. David Ellison’s presence at a White House dinner honoring the Saudi Crown Prince—just days before second-round bids were due—highlights the fusion of wealth, power, and influence shaping Hollywood’s future.

Larry Ellison remains one of the most influential political donors in the United States—and the largest private donor to the Israel Defense Forces. His extensive financial footprint across U.S. politics raises concerns about whether a Paramount-Skydance acquisition would face meaningful regulatory scrutiny or merely the appearance of it.

Amazon MGM’s $40 million acquisition of Brett Ratner’s documentary about Melania Trump highlights the nexus of media, politics, and private capital orbiting the Ellisons. Ratner—who fled to Israel in 2023 after misconduct allegations—has resurged just as Donald Trump reportedly pressed Larry Ellison to revive Rush Hour 4, with Paramount now closing in on a distribution deal. Amazon’s purchase also comes as Jeff Bezos maintains his own political proximity, from a $1 million donation to the Trump inauguration to the 2024 decision by The Washington Post to forgo endorsing a presidential candidate.

These threads point to the same conclusion: Hollywood’s future is increasingly being shaped not by audiences or market fundamentals, but by a small circle of political allies who operate beyond meaningful scrutiny.

---

FilmTake Away: A System Built to Fail—By Design

AFM 2025 didn’t signal a return to boom times, but it confirmed the business has a functioning center Warner Bros.’ latest sale process is evidence of a broken system in which studios collapse under the weight of debt, mismanagement, and executive enrichment, only to be snapped up by the next conglomerate hoping to alchemize value through consolidation.

Regulators have repeatedly allowed these deals to proceed with minimal scrutiny. The result is a hollowed-out industry where the same assets trade hands every few years, generating fees for bankers and bonuses for CEOs while long-term value erodes.

Whether Warner Bros. ends up with Paramount-Skydance, Comcast, Netflix, or no one at all, the message is clear: Hollywood’s future is being written not by creators or audiences but by a small circle of conglomerates and tech leviathans who have not demonstrated the competence or discipline needed to safeguard one of America’s most important cultural institutions.

---