Cannes 2025: Rising Costs, Fewer Bets, and Smarter Deals in a High-Stakes Market

Despite record attendance and renewed energy on the Croisette, the Cannes 2025 Film Market is operating under the familiar strains of soaring acquisition costs and a growing disconnect between inflated budgets and increasingly fragile margins.

While the spectacle remains intact, the real business unfolding behind closed doors is defined by sober calculation. For buyers and sellers alike, Cannes 2025 is less about appearances and more about financial clarity, pricing discipline, and navigating an unpredictable distribution battlefield shaped by shifting streamer appetites, geopolitical uncertainties, and thinning pre-sale viability.

---

Prices Surge, Pre-Sales Thin, Theatrical Remains Uncertain

One theme in force at Cannes 2025 is overheated pricing, particularly for festival-selected titles. Buyers across the board have noted that the most competitive packages—especially those in Competition and Un Certain Regard—are commanding seven-figure minimum guarantees, often before the first screening. This year’s bidding climate has echoed the pre-lockdown frenzy, with top-tier distributors locked in aggressive negotiations, even as downstream revenue forecasts remain shaky.

Several European buyers, citing recent examples, where inflated market pricing failed to align with theatrical performance, making recovery nearly impossible. While the high-end titles may still justify their premiums, the middle tier—once considered relatively safe ground—is now viewed as the most volatile segment, with buyers walking away or recalibrating offers well below asking price.

European distributors from Germany, Benelux, and the UK all reported being outbid on titles that, in some cases, underperformed significantly in prior cycles. The cautionary tale of “Parthenope,” a buzz-heavy title that failed to connect commercially, came up repeatedly. The top-tier films might justify their prices, but as always, the mid-tier is where the real risk lies.

Even in Asia, where distributors from Vietnam, Singapore, and Hong Kong were bullish on quality, the consensus was clear: standout titles command outsized attention, and buyers and sellers operate with tighter filters.

Blind offers are still being made, particularly on in-development projects by well-known directors, but with much more financial scrutiny. The risk tolerance remains, but it is increasingly paired with strategic selectivity.

---

Tariff Noise Casts Long Shadows Across an Already Cautious Market

President Trump’s abrupt proposal of a 100% tariff on foreign-produced films landed just days before Cannes, sending a jolt through the international rights business. While most industry veterans treat the declaration as political posturing, the timing was enough to cloud negotiations and raise doubts about the reliability of U.S. pre-sales.

For international sellers and financing outfits reliant on cross-border co-productions, the announcement was a reminder of the fragility embedded in global financing models. Distributors across Europe and North America acknowledged an initial wave of concern, though the prevailing attitude now leans toward caution rather than panic.

---

Theatrical Performance Remains Critical

While downstream markets continue to fracture, theatrical performance remains the dominant predictor of long-term value. Buyers across major European territories were united in emphasizing the importance of a strong theatrical showing, not just for budget recoupment, but as a signal to SVOD and Pay-1 buyers still willing to acquire.

Yet theatrical has become more unpredictable than ever. In territories like France and the Netherlands, a winner-takes-all trend has emerged: a handful of titles secure the majority of admissions, while the rest struggle to survive the opening weekend. Germany has seen similar trends, with arthouse releases succeeding spectacularly or disappearing entirely.

Services like Cineville in the Netherlands and Nonstop in Austria are helping bring younger and older audiences back into theaters, but they also underscore a deeper problem—a thinning middle ground. Films either connect or vanish. After global lockdowns, audiences broke from the habit of seeing films in theaters, which most distributors encouraged through more aggressive streaming strategies.

Without the cushion of robust physical, television, or transactional VOD sales, the financial pressure on theatrical success is extreme. Distributors are putting more emphasis than ever on launch timing, campaign strategy, and press coverage, not just to drive admissions, but to strengthen licensing downstream.

FilmTake’s licensing and valuation reports remain essential in this landscape, providing the complex data needed to structure smarter, leaner deals. With rising costs, fluctuating demand, and political uncertainty, the only constant at Cannes 2025 is this: smart money moves early, moves strategically, and doesn’t get distracted by the noise.

---

Discover What Streaming Services Pay to License Films and Shows

---

Marché Realism Replaces Red-Carpet Hype

Despite the soothing Mediterranean sun, yachts, and glamour, the market atmosphere in 2025 is more grounded. Sales agents are reporting steady, if not spectacular, deal flow. Buyers are focused, informed, and realistic about performance expectations.

The Marché has cemented itself as the most vital global market, not just for completed films, but for future slates. Midway between Sundance and AFM, its timing allows it to serve as both a sales environment and a launching pad for production partnerships.

Market panels addressing relevance and sustainability, AI integration, and emerging markets received strong attendance, suggesting that professionals are increasingly focused on the long game, which might be too late. With more companies bringing their own capital or joining as executive producers, Cannes is evolving into a marketplace of both rights and risk.

The Thunder Road and Untravelled Worlds development pact announced during the market is emblematic of this shift. With a multimillion-dollar fund and a slate of in-development projects, the partnership signals a new model for independent production: one that starts at Cannes, long before the cameras roll.

---

Streaming Appetite Shrinks, AVOD Offers Complexity

While streamers remain active in Cannes, their behavior has shifted decisively. Gone are the days of high-volume speculative buys. Instead, Netflix, Amazon, Max, and Peacock target packages combining visibility, IP strength, and marketing flexibility.

Meanwhile, AVOD platforms—long discussed as a lifeline for independent film—are growing, but not fast enough to offset declines in other sectors. These platforms are seen more as a tertiary window than a driver of acquisition activity. With opaque data models and inconsistent monetization, AVOD remains difficult to forecast.

The shift underscores the urgent need for producers and distributors to rethink monetization strategies. Traditional subscription-based and theatrical-first models no longer offer the predictability they once did. Instead, rights holders must explore hybrid releases, window segmentation, and performance-based ad revenue models, each with risks and rewards.

---

Vertical Integration Gains Traction

Several distributors are moving upstream into co-production and development financing in response to market pressure. Vue Lumière, Alamode Film, and Pyramide are among the European players deepening their involvement earlier in the process to secure rights and influence production planning.

This shift is driven less by creative ambition than by financial necessity. With content costs rising and post-theatrical options narrowing, early involvement offers better control over territory rights, marketing rollout, and cost structures.

But it’s not without risk. Co-production exposure adds operational complexity, from navigating regional funding criteria to managing creative control across borders. With public subsidies becoming more competitive and some regional incentives tightening or expiring altogether, the margin for error is shrinking.

Distributors entering as co-producers must now not only raise capital earlier, but also assume greater development risk and shoulder more of the delivery timeline. That said, for buyers increasingly priced out of studio-driven packages at Cannes, co-production remains one of the last viable ways to secure access to prestige content with territorial control. By coming in early, these distributors can lock rights, shape marketing timelines, and avoid inflated minimum guarantees at the peak of bidding season—provided they’re prepared for the administrative and financial burdens that come with it.

---

FilmTake Away: At Cannes, Smart Money Moves Early

This year’s market confirms what insiders already suspected: the economics of independent film are undergoing a structural realignment.
Cannes remains essential, but not for chasing inflated packages or following festival buzz. Success in 2025 hinges on preparation, discipline, and financial transparency. Buyers must approach each title with taste and precise projections on territory performance, downstream licensing potential, and realistic cost recovery windows.

Producers and distributors alike must reassess what success looks like. That may mean prioritizing theatrical viability over prestige; co-producing in exchange for territorial rights; or accepting AVOD as part of the lifecycle, not an afterthought.

---