Will California’s $750 Million Film Incentive Revive Production or Reward Studios?

In a long-awaited move, California lawmakers have approved a dramatic expansion of the state’s Film and Television Tax Credit Program, more than doubling the annual cap from $330 million to $750 million.

The legislation, initially proposed by Governor Gavin Newsom, is designed to stem the tide of productions fleeing to other states and countries with more generous incentive packages. While hailed by many industry groups as a lifeline for California’s entertainment workers, others warn the windfall may enrich major studios without solving the deeper structural issues plaguing Los Angeles production.

---

Hollywood Gets a Lifeline – But Is It Enough?

After years of tumultuous setbacks—ranging from unprecedented shutdowns and dual labor strikes to a sustained erosion of local production—California’s entertainment workforce finally has a reason for cautious optimism. With the July 1 rollout of Version 4.0 of the Film and Television Tax Credit Program, the state now offers one of the most competitive capped incentive packages in the nation. (California Film Commission Application)

California’s expanded $750 million fund makes it the third-largest incentive program in the U.S., still trailing Georgia’s uncapped benefits and New York’s newly increased $800 million ceiling. In 2024, Georgia awarded $887 million in tax credits—underscoring the fierce interstate competition California faces.

The timing of this expansion is critical. In 2024, Los Angeles production days fell to their second-lowest level on record, and since 2022, the state has shed more than 17,000 entertainment jobs. Unions and guilds mounted an aggressive lobbying effort to frame the tax credit not as a corporate giveaway but as a “jobs bill” aimed at revitalizing the broader creative economy—including thousands of small businesses tied to production.

Still, debate persists about the efficacy of the program. Critics argue that California’s tax incentives have failed to generate sufficient economic return to justify their cost and warn that further expansion could become fiscally unsustainable. Conversely, supporters claim that each taxpayer dollar invested yields up to $24.40 in economic output, thanks to increased employment, tourism, and spending in local economies.

Compounding these fiscal concerns are rising security risks. A growing number of producers are wary of escalating civil unrest in Los Angeles. The memory of the 2020 BLM riots—marked by widespread property damage and halted productions—has been reignited by the 2025 ICE-related riots, which have caused hundreds of millions in losses across the city. Insurance providers are now reassessing coverage for shoots in urban areas, and many location managers are quietly diverting projects to more stable out-of-state regions. Even with expanded incentives, some in the industry fear that the risks of filming in California’s major metropolitan areas may still outweigh the financial benefits.

---

Expanded Eligibility and Higher Project Caps

The funding increase is only one part of the state’s new strategy. A second measure, AB 1138—expected to be finalized in early July—proposes raising per-project tax credits from the standard 20–25% up to 35% for qualified expenditures in Los Angeles, and as high as 40% for shoots in designated economic opportunity zones outside Los Angeles.

The bill also expands eligibility to include animated features, shorter-form TV series, and select unscripted productions. These programmatic changes aim to lure back a broader range of content, from tentpoles to micro-budget indies, while reducing the current overreliance on major studio projects.

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors has thrown its full support behind AB 1138 and its companion bill, SB 630, both aimed at overhauling California’s tax credit framework. Key suggestions from the Board include removing the $100 million cap on qualifying expenditures, expanding the California Film Commission’s discretionary authority, and raising the credit rate to as high as 35%–40%, depending on where and how the production is shot.

---

48 Projects Greenlit: Independent Films Dominate  

Last week, California announced a new round of tax credit allocations, approving 48 productions—43 of which are independent features. This slate is expected to inject $664 million into the California economy, supporting over 6,500 cast and crew jobs and generating more than 32,000 workdays for background performers.

While five studio projects made the list—including TriStar’s “One of Them Days” sequel—many of the major beneficiaries are independent productions. These include “Gold Mountain,” “The Teller,” and “They Follow,” which are scheduled to film primarily outside Los Angeles, tapping into the extra 5% bonus for “out-of-zone” filming.

More than half of these projects will still shoot in L.A., while others will spread production activity to San Francisco, Bakersfield, El Dorado County, and Southern California’s inland empire.

---

Discover What Streaming Services Pay to License Films and Shows

---

Persistent Hurdles: FilmLA, High Costs, and Global Flight

Despite the fanfare, several long-standing problems remain unresolved. Chief among them is FilmLA—the nonprofit that manages permits in Los Angeles. Critics blame the organization for bureaucratic delays and excessive fees that continue to frustrate producers and disincentivize local shoots.

Others point to high crew and equipment costs as a more structural problem. Crews in Atlanta cost nearly half as much, while Eastern European talent pools—trained on major studio franchises over the last decade—are increasingly seen as higher value.

Skeptics also question the timing. Studios spent the downtime of the 2023 strikes exploring cheaper international options. With Georgia offering uncapped credits and streamlined permitting, some doubt California’s efforts will result in a true production boom.

And for all the investment, the California program remains capped—meaning studios may still opt to shoot elsewhere once the funding pool dries up after each funding cycle.

---

The Case for Federal Incentives – or Tariffs?

Amid California’s push to reclaim productions, calls are growing louder for a national strategy. Some industry advocates are lobbying for federal tax incentives to level the playing field, while others propose punitive tariffs on films made overseas. Although unlikely to materialize, these proposals underscore the urgency with which both political parties now view the decline of the entertainment sector.

For now, California is betting that its historic expansion, combined with retooled eligibility criteria, will be enough to restore confidence in Hollywood’s production infrastructure. However, whether this influx of public funding can reverse years of decline, bureaucracy, and competition remains uncertain—especially as studios continue to explore cheaper, more efficient production hubs outside the state and around the world.

---

FilmTake Away: Tax Credits Alone Won’t Save California Production

California’s $750 million annual tax credit expansion is a public funding gamble to keep the state’s creative economy from collapsing under the weight of global competition and local dysfunction. While the new measures bring short-term relief and a surge in independent production, the broader revival of Los Angeles as a global production hub still hinges on reducing overhead, reforming permitting systems like FilmLA, and re-establishing confidence that California can offer not just incentives—but also reliability.

Without structural reforms, the tax credits may serve as a temporary fix for an industry still hemorrhaging jobs, talent, and market share.

---